Our latest quarterly reviews of global office and logistics capital markets explore the appetite for deal-making across key EMEA, North America, and APAC markets.
Welcome
Taking Stock
A review of global real estate capital markets, Q2 2024
Oliver Salmon
Director, World ResearchGlobal Capital Markets
Rasheed Hassan
Head of Global Cross Border InvestmentGlobal Capital Markets
download the full report
We hope you enjoy our latest review of global real estate capital markets.
EXPLORE THE REPORT
Global outlook
Regional outlook
Market view
GLOBAL OUTLOOK
Savills 2024
Back to the top
An interest-rate driven downturn in real estate capital markets may soon give way to an interest-rate driven recovery. The eagerly anticipated pivot in monetary policy is finally upon on, with many global central banks now feeling more at ease with the outlook for inflation. Sentiment in the market has already noticeably improved, while various indicators across pricing and activity metrics would suggest that the bottom is either already behind us, or very close to being behind us.
Sign up to our Global Capital Markets Newsletter
‘The week in review’ is our take on the major global macro events of the week, and their implications for real estate.
Sign up now
next page
Annual Review
Living
Logistics
Offices
regional OUTLOOK
Director, World Research
The IMF expects global GDP growth in 2024 to remain stable.
3.2%
Global office investment fell by nearly 10% y/y in Q2 2024.
US$36bn
The share of investment backed by cross border investors year-to-date is half the long-term average.
16.1%
While the monetary policy backdrop remains restrictive,we are now at the beginning of an easing cycle that willsupport growth in the coming years. Headline inflationis trending back to target, supported by disinflation inenergy and goods prices. Services price inflation remainselevated in most economies, underpinned by strongnominal wage growth. But labour market dynamics aresuch that central banks are increasingly confident thatthe diminished risk of persistent inflation favours a morerelaxed policy setting. In early June, the Bank of Canada became the first centralbank of the G7 group of major economies to cut interestrates, swiftly followed by the ECB. Others are expected tofollow; the Bank of England cut rates in August, while theUS Fed is hinting at a September move. The PBoC in Chinahas continued to ease policy rates, elongating an easingcycle that was trigged by the Covid-19 pandemic, andexacerbated by a property market downturn that will dragon the economy for years to come.
The global economy continues to track expectations
Elsewhere in Asia Pacific, central banks are likely tofollow the US Fed, particularly in those markets sensitiveto exchange rate volatility, such as South Korea. Japan,meanwhile, is looking to move in the opposite direction,while the Reserve Bank of Australia is keeping all optionsopen, following a resurgence in inflation that may requireanother rate hike before the year end. We are, however, reminded that this is not a normalcycle, and the path back to neutral may take severalyears. The global economy has shown a remarkableresilience to a series of major shocks over the last fewyears, but with this resilience comes the monotony ofan uninspiring recovery, with implications for global realestate markets. The IMF is forecasting global growthto remain broadly unchanged at 2023 levels for thenext three years, albeit there is some rotation expectedacross advanced economies; as we move in to 2025, amore concerted recovery in Europe will substitute a mildslowdown in the US.
Global office investment turnover
Total office investment fell further in the second quarter,down nearly 10% on the year to US$36bn. The US$78bntransacted in the first six months of 2024 was the lowestH1 outturn in 14 years, and represents a near 60% declineon the 2015-19 average. Private investors remain the dominant buyer group atthe beginning of this year, while owner-occupiers continue to be more active, looking to capitalise on the ongoing correction in values. Cross border investors, by contrast, have largely withdrawn from global office markets. Foreign investors have offloaded a net US$7.5bn in assets so far this year, in what is a sharp reversal of the pre-Covid trend of being large net buyers (in contrast, they remain net buyers of other core sectors). From a transactional perspective, long-haul capital in particular has been largely absent from the market, accounting for just 5% of all deals by value this year, down from a longer-term average of around 15-20%. Some of these investors are looking closer to home; theUS$23bn of domestic investment backed by institutionsin the first half of this year represents around 75% oftheir total spend last year. But many global institutionshave continued to sit on their hands, or revisit theirexposure to offices and reallocate to other sectors. Thisis also evident in the fundraising data, with capital raisedby dedicated office funds falling by more than 60% y/y inthe first half of 2024.
The outlook for pricing is a little more encouraging.Trends in occupier demand have supported the primeend of the market throughout this cycle, driving solidrental growth, particularly in those markets wheresupply is limited. Yields have largely topped out as aresult, with some markets now expecting to see themcompress over the next 12 months as interest rates comedown, including in London. The only significant shift inour benchmark yields this quarter was in Sydney, withyields moving out by a further 25bps, but this is morea function of a lagged adjustment in valuations ratherthan any unique weakness. A few markets may see somefurther outward movement – such as in China, where thesupply-demand balance remains very challenging. While the backward-looking transactional data paintsa relatively sombre picture, the outlook on pricing andvalues points to a slowly shifting narrative. Investorsare now more comfortable with the value propositionof offices; supported by the resilience in occupationalmarkets. In many markets such as Japan and London, itis more a lack of stock that is preventing a recovery inactivity, rather than a lack of demand. Good assets areseeing greater buyer competition, but many landlordslack a motivation to sell. We will probably need to see acombination of lower interest rates and perhaps someyield compression before we see more core moneytransact. In the interim, the opportunities lie in findingthose landlords that are under pressure to offload assets.
Besieged office market turning a corner
Prime office yields, Q1 2024
Los Angeles 8.00%
Sydney 5.85%
Shanghai (Lujiazui) 4.50%
Hong Kong 1.82%
Tokyo 2.60%
Singapore 3.60%
Seoul 4.25%
New York 5.00%
Paris 4.25%
Frankfurt 4.50%
Madrid 4.90%
London (City) 5.25%
Dubai 6.75%
Sydney
Shanghai (Lujiazui)
Frankfurt
Tokyo
Hong Kong
Singapore
Los Angeles
Paris
London (City)
Madrid
Dubai
New York
Seoul
Prime yield
Outlook for yields, next 12 months
Typical LTV
All-in cost of debt
Cash-on-cash yield
Risk premium (over gov bonds)
Source: Savills Research and Macrobond. Note: Yields may be different to quoted values in markets where the convention is to use a gross rather than net value. Values based on end-of-quarter data. See Methodology for details.
Net initial yields are estimated by local Savills experts to represent the achievable yield, including transaction and non-recoverable costs, on a hypothetical grade A building located in the CBD, over 50,000 sq ft in size, fully let to a single good profile tenant on a long lease. The typical LTV and cost of debt represent the anticipated competitive lending terms available in each market. Cash-on-cash returns illustrate the initial yield on equity, assuming the aforementioned LTV and debt costs. The risk premium is calculated by subtracting the end-of-period domestic ten-year government bond yield (as a proxy for the relevant risk-free rate of return) from the net initial yield. Data is end-of-quarter values.
(as at end-March)
Methodology
welcome
Mumbai 8.25%
Mumbai
Sydney 53%
Shanghai (Lujiazui) 50%
Frankfurt 55%
Tokyo 60%
Hong Kong 40%
Singapore 50%
Los Angeles 53%
Paris 55%
London (City) 55%
Madrid 50%
Dubai 50%
Mumbai 60%
New York 53%
Seoul 63%
Sydney 6.00%
Shanghai (Lujiazui) 4.00%
Frankfurt 4.40%
Tokyo 1.00%
Hong Kong 6.50%
Singapore 4.45%
Paris 4.40%
London (City) 5.86%
Madrid 4.80%
Dubai 8.00%
Mumbai 9.50%
New York 8.00%
Seoul 4.90%
Sydney 5.68%
Shanghai (Lujiazui) 5.00%
Frankfurt 4.51%
Tokyo 5.00%
Hong Kong -1.30%
Singapore 2.75%
Paris 4.07%
London (City) 4.50%
Madrid 5.00%
Dubai 5.50%
Mumbai 6.38%
New York 1.68%
Seoul 3.17%
Sydney 1.88%
Shanghai (Lujiazui) 2.21%
Frankfurt 2.21%
Tokyo 1.87%
Hong Kong -1.89%
Singapore 0.49%
Los Angeles 3.80%
Paris 1.43%
London (City) 1.33%
Madrid 1.75%
Dubai 2.55%
Mumbai 1.19%
New York 0.80%
Seoul 0.84%
Milan 4.25%
Milan
Milan 55%
Milan 3.33%
Milan 0.55%
Vendor Nationality: Singapore Purchaser: PAG Purchaser Nationality: Hong Kong Comments: Transaction represents the largest Singapore office deal completed in two years. The vendor is planning to use the proceeds of the divestment to reduce their debt burden. The sale represents a 14% increase on the purchase price from 2013.
City: Singapore Building: Mapletree Anson Tenant: 17 tenants including Goldman Sachs, Allied Insurance, Danone, and WeWork Lease Length (WAULT): 3.8 years Area: 320,000 sqft Price/NIY: SGD 775mn (US$ 566mn)/3.8% Vendor: Mapletree (MPACT)
key transactions
Vendor Nationality: US Purchaser: Bloomberg Purchaser Nationality: US Comments: In the largest US office transaction year-to-date (excluding portfolio deals), a company linked to Bloomberg purchased the property for occupancy.
City: New York Building: 980 Madison Tenant: Bloomberg Philanthropies Lease Length (WAULT): N/A Area: 130,000 sqft Price/NIY: US$ 560mn/Undisclosed Vendor: RFR Reality
Vendor Nationality: Belgium Purchaser: Government of Belgium Purchaser Nationality: Belgium Comments: With the European Commission aiming to reduce its office footprint by 25% by 2030, the Government of Belgium, via its Sovereign Wealth Fund, will renovate the buildings and redevelop some to create more housing and social spaces, as part of a wider push to revitalise the area.
City: Brussels Building: EU Commission Office Portfolio of 23 buildings Tenant: European Commission Lease Length (WAULT): N/A Area: 3.7mn sqft Price/NIY: €900mn (US$970mn)/Undisclosed Vendor: EU Commission
While the backward-looking transactional data paints a relatively sombre picture, the outlook on pricing and values points to a slowly shifting narrative.
Sign up noW
previous page
Distressed sales are yet to really build across the region, however those markets that have seen the largest value correction are unsurprisingly also experiencing the greatest difficulties.
Total investment across the EMEA region was broadly stable in the second quarter. However, activity was flattered by a single large portfolio deal, with the Belgium Government purchasing a portfolio of assets from the European Commission for €900mn (US$971mn). Based on individual property transactions, turnover was down by around 11% y/y. Cross border investors remain largely conspicuous by their absence. Around one-quarter of deals this year have been backed by foreign capital, down from longer term average of around 50%. Long-haul investors are almost non-existent; less than 5% of transactions were backed by investors based outside the region. Some US investors are understood to be back in the market however (primarily in London). In the interim, intra-regional flows are holding up, supported bythe French SCPIs – who are increasingly looking atopportunities in the UK – as well as German institutionsand Spanish privates. The Italian market has seen a strong start to the year, with investment doubling in the first half. This was underpinned by several notable transactions; Coima purchased a portfolio of three offices in central Rome for around €200mn (US$216mn), with plans to improve the sustainability credentials to achieve BREEAM certification. The positivity is supported by a relatively strong leasing market, underpinned by very low vacancy on grade A buildings, which is also encouraging somespeculative development.
Distressed sales are yet to really build across the region,however those markets that have seen the largest valuecorrection are unsurprisingly also experiencing thegreatest difficulties. The pressure is most evident inGermany – underpinned by a significant asset repricing,and a weak macroeconomic environment, with the latterfeeding into occupational markets; while take-up acrossthe six core city markets is up 4.5% on the year,it remains around 24% lower than pre-pandemic levels. Investment in France was down by nearly 60% on theyear in the first half. Political uncertainty will continue toweigh on activity in the traditional quiet summer period,even though the more extreme election outcomeswere avoided. But Paris remains a key office market forinvestors. The UK election result, by contrast, is likely tobring stability to the domestic political environment, andshould, in combination with a summer pivot by the Bankof England, support rising activity. Finally, in the Netherlands, while there were no majordeals in H1, sentiment is on the recovery, and thereare some larger deals in the pipeline. This includes thecompletion of Cross Towers by a consortium led by assetmanager Edge in July for a reported €172mn. There areplenty of requirements in the market, but like much ofthe region, it is difficult to source new product.
APAC
North America
EMEA
Property Values and Bank Non-Performing Loans (NPLs)
Distress continues to dominate the narrative and weigh heavily on market sentiment… the office sector accounts for around 40% of assets in distress in the US, and there is a growing evidence base of properties selling at significant discounts.
Distressed assets are selling for steep discounts
-70%
US office occupancy has stabilised at half the pre-Covid level
50%
Second quarter investment was 16% down on the year
US$11.3bn
South Korea is probably to hottest office market in the region, if not globally, right now.
Cross border office investment by origin of buyer
In the US, total investment of US$11.3bn in the secondquarter was more than 16% down on the year. Theyear-to-date comparison is more flattering, with totalinvestment up 6.6% y/y. However, this is heavily distortedby the merger of two large medical office REITs in thefirst quarter. Fundamentally, activity continues to trendat a fraction of pre-Covid levels. Distress continues to dominate the narrative and weighheavily on market sentiment. According to MSCI, theoffice sector accounts for around 40% of assets indistress in the US, and there is a growing evidencebase of properties selling at significant discounts. Thisincludes 1740 Broadway in New York, which was sold forUS$186mn this quarter, representing a 70% discount tothe 2014 purchase price. The buyer, Yellowstone RealEstate Investments, is rumoured to be considering a resiconversion. Other examples include 333 West WackerDrive in Chicago (down 60% in value from the previoussale in 2015), and 1455 Market Street in San Francisco,where one partial stake owner took an 80% haircut froma near US$220mn investment made back in 2015, to exittheir share of the property. Occupational markets are more encouraging. Leasingactivity is bottoming out, with nationwide occupancyholding steady at around 50% of the pre-pandemic levelssince the beginning of 2023. Lease expiries remain a major driver of activity, and the
macroeconomic outlook is less favourable, with office-based employment now trending down in many major markets. But some markets have seen an uptick in activity regardless, such as New York, where leasing volumes rose by nearly 9% in thefirst half of the year. Even in tech-centric San Francisco,generative AI startups are aggressively expanding theirfootprint, albeit from a low base. Here, investors areclosely watching the sale of 350 Bush Street as a markerfor where core pricing has moved. Availability rates arealso peaking out, in part due to supply side dynamicsrather than demand. Some markets such as LA, NewYork, and Washington DC, are seeing total officeinventory levels fall, but availability rates are extremelyhigh and will take some years to bring down. Class A rents are broadly stable on last year, despitethe large amounts of excess supply. Landlords are moreinclined to give concessions than to trim rents, andflight-to-quality continues to provide some support forbest-in-class assets. In New York, for example, around70% of all leasing activity is happening at the top endof the market. Where there is distress in capital markets– such as in LA and San Francisco – we are likely to seemore aggressive competition for tenants. Dallas-FortWorth is somewhat of an outlier, with demand steadyand broad-based across sectors, class A rents are up inexcess of 9% on the year. This bifurcation in the market,in combination with falling interest rates, should supportsome yield hardening over the next 12 months.
Investment turnover of US$12.0bn across the region was14% down on the year. The Japanese market was theprimary driver of this decline; investment there fell bymore than 37% y/y in local currency terms, with fewerdeals completed than in any quarter throughout thehistory spanning 18 years of data. However, this followsa strong start to the year, and activity in the first halfremains up on the year. A lack of available stock remains a major impediment totransactional activity in Japan. When new mandates arelaunched to the market, there is generally no shortageof interest. Nevertheless, cross border investors,particularly from the West, are notably absent; afterbacking nearly one-quarter of all deals through 2021-22, investors from North America and Europe haveacquired just 2% of deals by value this year. Thisdoes however include the largest deal of Q2, with theCanadian investment manager BGO paying JPY44.5bn(US$282mn) to purchase Honmachi Garden City in Osakafrom a local REIT, at a yield of 3.4%. South Korea is probably the hottest office market in theregion, if not globally, right now. In Seoul, tenant demandis quickly absorbing new vacancy, supporting strong primerental growth of 5.7% in Q2. With no large prime officeprojects expected to be delivered to the market until 2025,the current supply-demand imbalance is likely to persist
(particularly in the GBD region). In the near-term, investorsremain somewhat circumspect, watching the Bank ofKorea (and by implication, the US Fed). But more activityis expected in the second half with several large dealsprogressing, all likely to complete at yields of 3-4%. In Singapore, while the leasing market is still quiet,investment activity was much stronger in Q2. Rents andvacancy are broadly stable; with the latter supported byzero supply onboarding in H1. Investment in the quarterwas boosted by six block transactions, including threein excess of S$100mn (US$73mn). The largest deal wasthe sale of Mapletree Anson for S$775mn (US$566mn)to PAG, from Mapletree Pan Asia Commercial Trust, at ayield of 3.8%. In Australia, persistent inflation and greater uncertaintyaround the interest rate outlook are weighing onsentiment. However, steeper declines in asset valuesare beginning to drive a recovery in activity. The dealflow suggests an increased number of motivated sellers,with a number of major deals settling just before theend of the financial year. The pricing on major officetransactions in Sydney and Melbourne indicates thatsome assets are trading at a discount of up 25% fromtheir peak book values. Investors are keenly waiting forthe mid-year valuations from traded REITs to see if thiswill feed into a broad-based repricing.
market view
Share of investment backed by long-haul capital this year, down from a long-term average of around 25%
4.8%
A single transaction – a portfolio sale in Belgium – accounted for nearly one-tenth of all activity this quarter
9%
Total investment in EMEA was broadly stable on the year in Q2
US$ 11.2bn
Average vacancy rate in Seoul, with a lack of supply supporting above-inflation rental growth.
Deal volumes hit a record low in Q2, based on the number of transactions, spanning data going back to 2007.
39
Total investment was around 14% down on the year in the second quarter.
US$12bn
Prime office yields
(as at end-JUNE)
Head of Global Cross Border Investment
Rasheed Hassan shares his view on the market
regional outlook
An increasing number of markets globally are now unquestionably experiencing a tilt to the positive. In the major markets, with the exception of Japan, interest rates have largely peaked or are at the tail end of their journey, and we are now witnessing eagerly anticipated rate cuts. We are also through a number of the major global elections. Whether investors support the outcomes or not, this provides a level of clarity that they all crave. Lastly we have been on a journey of price falls, pretty unanimously, across geographies and sectors. These now seem to be slowing and in some cases starting to turn. Given all of this, it is not surprising that we are seeing some investors looking at markets with more intent, and finding ways to be more positive in their underwriting. We have reported often that this has been an anomalous downturn, whereby rising rents for prime assets in core locations, including in offices, is set against a backdrop of falling values. This has given the market a strong conviction that this is downturn is largely interest rate driven rather than fundamentals driven. Given where we are in monetary policy cycles, things should be looking up from here. There remains a shortage of committed vendors across all sectors, as the majority of owners want to wait until there are more datapoints to provide strong pricing comparables. But this is coming and it gives us hope that the busy end of year trading season will give the markets what’s needed as a backdrop for greater activity in 2025.
The cap rate vs. cost of money conundrum remains a cause for reticence for some core investors. However, buyers with a long hold horizon are viewing today’s core market pricing as largely ‘fair value’ and those with shorter term strategies are focusing on total returns. The demonstrable and forecast rental growth is a key factor in decision making for the total return buyers, coupled with a belief that the most core assets in the best locations will always be considered scarce and therefore have a deep buyer pool that will keep yields as compressed as possible when it comes to exit. There is also a belief that the pricing disparity between truly prime assets and those with some sort of blemish (location, building quality, lease term, tenure) is too great and will narrow as the markets re-gain confidence. Lastly, I would note that the shortage of investment product is leading to greater buyer interest when something does actually come to the market. In many cases, this is supporting more aggressive underwriting, as those buyers who truly want to get invested know that they have limited choice. As a result, we are seeing a number of processes resulting in more positive pricing outcomes than expected. If owners are considering sales in the next 6 to 12 months, they may give consideration to bringing assets to the market sooner rather than later, taking advantage of the lack of choice that investors are having to grapple with